You'll be re-directed to the Financial Professional site.
- Financial stocks lagged the U.S. stock market in 2020 on concerns that a weaker economy and lower interest rates would lead to higher credit losses and narrower profit margins for U.S. banks.
- Compared to past downturns, we believe the large U.S. banks are in much stronger shape, aided by their solid capital positions and prudent risk taking, as well as robust government support for businesses and consumers.
- The market has heavily discounted the valuations of U.S. Financials, which do not reflect their underlying strength in our opinion.
- Looking ahead, we believe large banks are well positioned to benefit from the vaccine rollout and anticipated economic rebound, which should lead to better growth and lower credit costs in 2021. Low interest rates will likely be a diminishing headwind to earnings in 2021. We expect capital returns to increase, as the Federal Reserve has allowed all the large banks to resume paying dividends and buying back their shares.
- The Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds—U.S. Stock Fund and Global Stock Fund are overweight U.S. Financials. We have strong conviction in these holdings1 and believe their long-term risk-reward profiles are compelling at current valuation levels.
In the U.S. equity market, the Financials sector was one of the worst performers in 2020. While the overall market posted double-digit returns, Financials declined amid concerns over credit and interest rate risk. When the economy faltered in the spring under the weight of global coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic lockdowns, many investors made two assumptions: 1) that banks would suffer significant credit losses, and 2) that the ultra-low interest rates would squeeze margins.
However, in our view, those investors overestimated the damage the recession would cause financial services companies and underestimated the underlying strength of their businesses and potential to deliver strong returns in a post-pandemic economic recovery. In this paper, we will explain why the Dodge & Cox Stock Fund, Global Stock Fund, and Balanced Fund have significant exposure to U.S. Financials (see Figure 1), even at a time of prolonged low-interest rates. We will use the Funds’ holdings of large U.S. banks to make that case.
Figure 1: Funds Are Overweight U.S. Financials2
Source: FactSet, LSE Group, MSCI, and S&P.
Why This Downturn Is Different
The last time the U.S. economy contracted—during the 2008- 2009 global financial crisis—bank stocks fell sharply. Many were heavily exposed to the housing market, which was the epicenter of the downturn. In subsequent years, regulatory changes in response to the crisis led to a step-function decline in return on equity across the sector.
In contrast, most U.S. banks entered 2020 with low leverage, restrained risk taking, and well-diversified revenue sources. The banking industry’s resilient profitability through the downturn validated post-crisis reforms.
But that is not the only contrast between now and then. The nature of the downturn itself is different and so have been the policy responses. Fundamentally, the pandemic is a health crisis that led to a sudden stop in economic activity. The U.S. government stepped in quickly with the CARES Act, a $2.2 trillion relief package to help struggling businesses and consumers, and passed a $900 billion second round of stimulus in December. By all accounts, the U.S. economy shrank in 2020 but not nearly as much as forecasters originally feared. The upshot: U.S. banks overall have remained profitable, built capital levels, and supported the real economy through the crisis.
In anticipation of a sharper downturn, many banks set aside significant provisions for expected credit losses in 2020. As a result, they are broadly reserved for higher levels of joblessness than the United States is currently experiencing. Unless the economic outlook deteriorates, that should mean large banks will not have to build additional reserves and, in fact, some could release reserves in 2021. In December, all large U.S. banks passed the Federal Reserve’s off-cycle stress test and were granted permission to return 100% of their average last four quarters’ profits through dividends and share buybacks in the first quarter of 2021.
Finally, the large banks have benefited from unexpected strength in a number of business lines. Revenues from capital markets trading and mortgage banking have been robust. In terms of collateral backing loans, price levels for homes, used cars, and equities have all remained resilient.
Suffice it to say this has been an unusual economic crisis, and the large banks are, in our opinion, positioned to emerge from it much stronger than they did following the global financial crisis.
Why We Are Optimistic About The Funds' U.S. Financials Holdings
We believe that market views of banks will change for several reasons.
- Earnings are bottoming out: As we have noted, banks front-loaded loan loss provisions in 2020 to levels that now appear conservative. We believe that low U.S. interest rates should be a diminishing headwind in 2021, unless the yield curve were to reverse course from its recent steepening.
- U.S. Financials are trading at inexpensive valuations: Financials’ valuations are near historic lows compared to the stock market as a whole (see Figure 2). The S&P 500 Banks industry trades at 13.4 times forward estimated earnings compared to 23.7 times for the broader S&P 500 Index. This large discount supports the value case for bank stocks.
Figure 2: The U.S. Financials Sector Is Trading Near Its Lowest Relative P/E Ratio
- Potential for capital returns to increase significantly: Amid the pandemic-induced downturn in early 2020, the Federal Reserve temporarily restricted bank payouts by barring stock buybacks and capping dividends. Now that those restrictions have been largely lifted, banks are better positioned to deliver high total yields through a combination of rising earnings and high dividend and buyback payouts. In a low-rate environment, high absolute yields support a valuation re-rating.
- Optimism that vaccines will boost the economy: As more Americans get vaccinated in 2021, the potential exists for a virtuous cycle of rising consumer demand and stronger corporate investment. This, in turn, could lead to a steeper yield curve, which would benefit bank net interest margins.
- Ability for strong banks to become stronger: We generally invest in leading franchises, many of which have 0.5x 0.6x 0.7x 0.8x 0.9x 1.0x 1.1x 1.2x 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020 Figure 2: The U.S. Financials Sector Is Trading Near Its Lowest Relative P/E Ratio Source: FactSet, LSE Group, MSCI, and S&P. 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Stock Fund S&P 500 Index Russell 1000 Value Index Global Stock Fund MSCI World Index MSCI ACWI Index Balanced Fund Combined Index U.S. Financials Weight U.S. BANKS: A COMPELLING LONG-TERM VALUE OPPORTUNIT Y 3 Complete transparency and accuracy in disclosures gained deposit market share and improved efficiency in recent years (see Capital One3 sidebar). Their advantage stems in part from heavy investments in technology. Bank of America and J.P. Morgan, for example, have both spent over $10 billion a year on technology to meet the evolving digital needs of their customers. These two banks and many others have navigated the pandemic well, as digitization accelerated, and we expect them to continue to gain share in the recovery.
The Role of ESG
As fundamental investors, we are focused on all factors that can affect a company’s performance. Therefore, environmental, social, and governance issues (ESG) are an important part of our analysis. In the banking realm, Wells Fargo, one of the Funds’ largest positions, is an example of how we integrate ESG factors into our research process.
In 2016, reports surfaced alleging that Wells Fargo had created accounts without the consent of customers. The reports drew the attention of politicians and regulators and resulted in substantial fines, tougher regulatory scrutiny, and significant turnover in the bank’s executive ranks and board of directors. Wells Fargo’s management team is almost entirely new and 11 of the 13 current directors have joined the board since the problems arose. The bank subsequently revamped its compensation and incentive systems, centralized its risk functions, and flattened its operating structure. We remain in continuous contact with the company to maintain a clear understanding of the management team’s priorities and developments. In our judgement, the bank now has the right leadership team, with a strong sense of urgency to return the business segments to best-in-class over time. We remain investors in Wells Fargo’s stock, and we continue to monitor management’s progress closely.
The new Biden Administration has taken office in Washington, which could affect U.S. banks. As a candidate, President Biden supported higher corporate taxes, which would be negative for the Financials sector. It remains to be seen whether Biden will prioritize tax reform, and if so, whether Congress will pass related legislation. We are closely watching the administration’s personnel decisions, which will shape regulatory oversight. In the meantime, the $900 billion COVID-relief bill passed by Congress in December should help the economy and U.S. banks.
Our Rigorous Investment Process
In keeping with our well-established processes, we have examined and reevaluated the Funds’ financial services holdings continuously throughout the pandemic to retest our investment theses. We have explored the impact of low-interest rates, higher credit losses, and the resilience of capital ratios at each company in which we invest. We have also stress tested each holding under a range of scenarios.
In our Sector and Investment Committee meetings, we have held rigorous debates, employing a devil’s advocate to challenge our investment theses. All of these steps have reinforced our confidence in the strength of the Funds’ U.S. Financials holdings.
We cannot say with any precision when other investors will come around to our view of U.S. financial services stocks. But we are confident that the U.S. banks held in the Funds represent attractive long-term investments for the reasons we have outlined: valuations are inexpensive, fundamentals are resilient, capital returns will potentially rise, and there is optimism that widespread vaccination will lead to a stronger economy and a better operating environment for the banks, especially the industry-leading franchises that we favor.
This information should not be considered a solicitation or an offer to purchase shares of Dodge & Cox Worldwide Funds plc or a solicitation or an offer by Dodge & Cox Worldwide Investments and its affiliates to provide any services in any jurisdiction. The views expressed herein represent the opinions of Dodge & Cox Worldwide Investments and its affiliates and are not intended as a forecast or guarantee of future results for any product or service. To obtain more information about the Funds, please refer to the Funds' prospectus at dodgeandcoxworldwide.com.
The above information is not a complete analysis of every material fact concerning any market, industry, or investment. Data has been obtained from sources considered reliable, but Dodge & Cox makes no representations as to the completeness or accuracy of such information. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice.
The information provided is historical and does not predict future results or profitability. This is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security and is not indicative of Dodge & Cox’s current or future trading activity. Any securities identified are subject to change without notice and do not represent a Fund’s entire holdings.
The S&P 500 Index is a market capitalization-weighted index of 500 large-capitalization stocks commonly used to represent the U.S. equity market. The S&P 500 Index is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates and has been licensed for use by Dodge & Cox. Copyright 2020 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
The Russell 1000 Value Index is a broad-based, unmanaged equity market index composed of those Russell 1000 companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. London Stock Exchange Group plc and its group undertakings (collectively, the “LSE Group”). © LSE Group 2020. FTSE Russell is a trading name of certain of the LSE Group companies. “Russell®” and The Yield Book®” are a trade mark(s) of the relevant LSE Group companies and is/are used by any other LSE Group company under license. All rights in the FTSE Russell indexes or data vest in the relevant LSE Group company which owns the index or the data. Neither LSE Group nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the indexes or data and no party may rely on any indexes or data contained in this communication. No further distribution of data from the LSE Group is permitted without the relevant LSE Group company's express written consent. The LSE Group does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.
1 As of 31 December 2020. Dodge & Cox Stock Fund (% of Fund’s net assets): American Express (1.5%), Bank of America (2.8%), Bank of New York Mellon (2.3%), Brighthouse Financial (0.3%), Capital One Financial (4.3%), Charles Schwab (3.9%), Goldman Sachs (2.2%), JPMorgan Chase (1.4%), Lincoln National (0.3%), MetLife (2.8%), State Street (1.4%), Truist Financial (1.0%), and Wells Fargo (3.7%). Dodge & Cox Global Stock Fund (% of Fund’s net assets): Bank of America (0.9%), Bank of New York Mellon (0.8%), Capital One Financial (2.2%), Charles Schwab (1.5%), MetLife (0.7%), and Wells Fargo (2.7%). Dodge & Cox Balanced Fund (% of Fund’s net assets): American Express (1.1%), Bank of America (2.6%), Bank of New York Mellon (1.5%), Brighthouse Financial (0.3%), Capital One Financial (3.1%), Charles Schwab (2.8%), Citigroup (1.1%), Goldman Sachs (1.4%), JPMorgan Chase (1.7%), Lincoln National (0.3%), MetLife (2.0%), State Street (0.9%), Truist Financial (0.7%), Unum (0.1%), and Wells Fargo (3.1%).
2 Unless otherwise specified, all weightings and characteristics are as of 31 December 2020.
3 The use of specific examples does not imply that they are more or less attractive investments than the portfolio’s other holdings.